|
Issue 3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Glimpses of a Golden Childhood
1984 in Lao Tzu House, Rajneeshpuram, USA
Chapter
# 37
Chapter
# 38
Chapter
# 39
Chapter # 40
Okay.
We are only at the second day of my primary school. It is going to be like that. Every day opens up so many things. I have not finished even the second day yet. Today I will do my best to finish it.
Life is interlinked, you cannot cut it into neat pieces. It is not a piece of cloth. You cannot cut it at all, because the moment you cut it from all its connections it is no longer the same. It becomes something dead, not breathing. I want it to take its own course, not even to direct it, because I have not directed it in the first place. It took its own course -- unguided.
In fact, I hated guides and still do because they prevent you from flowing with that which is. They direct, their business is to hurry you up to the next point. Their work is to make you feel as if you have come to know. Neither they know, nor you.
Knowing only comes through living unguided, undirected. That is the way I have lived and am still living.
It's a strange fate. Even from my very childhood I knew this was not my home. It was my Nana's house, and my father and mother were far away. I had hoped that perhaps my home would be there, but no, it was just a big guest house, with my poor mother and father serving the guests continuously, for no reason -- at least to me there seemed to be none.
Again I said to myself, "This is not the home I was looking for. Now where do I go? My grandfather is dead, so I cannot go back to that house."
It was his house, and without him, just the house is meaningless. If my Nani had gone back it would have meant something, ninety-nine percent at least, but she refused to go.
She said, "I went there for him, and if he is not there then there is no other reason for me to return. Of course if he comes back, I am ready, but if he is not coming back, if he cannot keep his promise, why should I bother about his house and property? -- they were never mine. There is always somebody who can take care of these things. I am not meant for them. I did not go for them in the first place, and I will not return for them."
She refused so totally that I learned how to refuse... and I learned how to love. After leaving that house, we stayed a few days with my father's family. It was certainly not just a family, but more a gathering of tribes, many families; perhaps a kind of mela, a fair. But we only stayed for a few days. That too was not my house. I stayed there just to have a look at it, then moved.
Since then, how many houses have I lived in? It is almost impossible for you to imagine that in almost fifty years of life I have been just moving houses, and doing nothing else. Of course, the grass was growing -- I was moving house, and doing nothing, and the grass was growing. But the whole credit goes to "nothing," not to my moving house.
After that I moved to my Nani's house, and then to one of my uncles' -- my father's sister's husband's house -- where I had gone to study after matriculation. They had thought it would be only for a few days, but those days proved longer than they had thought. No hostel was ready to take me in because my records were so "beautiful." The remarks given by all my teachers, and particularly by the principal, were really worth preserving. Everybody condemned me as much as was allowed on a certificate.
I had told them to their faces, "This is not a character certificate, this is a character assassination. Please write as a P.S. that, `I call this document a character assassination.' Unless you write it, I will not take it." They had to.
They said to me, "You are not only mischievous but dangerous too, because now you can sue us."
I said, "Don't be afraid. In my life many will sue me in the courts; I will never sue anybody."
I have not sued anybody although I could have done it very easily, and hundreds would have been punished.
I was saying I have never had a house. Even this house, I cannot call it "my house." From the first one to the last, perhaps this is not the last, but whichever is the last, I cannot call it my house. Just to hide the fact, I call it Lao Tzu House. Lao Tzu has nothing to do with it.
And I know the man. I know that if he meets me -- and someday a meeting is bound to happen -- the first thing he will ask will be, "Why did you name your house `Lao Tzu House'?" Naturally, the curiosity of a child -- and nobody could be more childlike than Lao Tzu, neither Buddha, nor Jesus, nor Mohammed, and certainly not Moses. A Jew being childlike? Impossible!
A Jew is born a businessman, with a business suit, just leaving the house and going to the shop. He comes ready-made. Moses? -- certainly not. But Lao Tzu, or if you want someone even more childlike than Lao Tzu, then his disciple, Chuang Tzu.... To be a disciple of Lao Tzu one needed to be more innocent than Lao Tzu himself. There is no other way.
Confucius was just refused. In short, he was told to "Get out, and get lost forever -- and remember, do not return to this place again." Not actually in these words, but that was the very essence of what Lao Tzu said to Confucius, the most scholarly man of that day. Confucius could not be accepted, but Chuang Tzu was even crazier than Lao Tzu, his Master. When Chuang Tzu came, Lao Tzu said, "Great! Are you here to be my Master? You can choose: either you can be my Master, or I can be your Master."
Chuang Tzu replied, "Forget all about that! Why can't we just be?"
And that was the way they remained. Of course Chuang Tzu was a disciple and very respectful to the Master. Nobody could compete with him, but that's the way they started, with him saying, "Can't we forget all about that rot?" -- I add the word "rot" to make it exactly what it would have been. But that does not mean that he was not respectful. Even after this, Lao Tzu laughed and said, "Just great! I was waiting for you." And Chuang Tzu touched the Master's feet.
Lao Tzu said, "What!"
Chuang Tzu said, "Don't bring anything in between us. If I feel like touching your feet, then nobody can prevent me, neither you nor I. We have just to watch it happen."
And I had to watch it happen, moving from one house to another. I can remember hundreds of houses, but not a single one where I could have said, "This is my house." I was hoping, perhaps this one... that's been the way for my whole life: "Perhaps the next one."
Still, I will tell you a secret. I am still hoping to have a house somewhere, perhaps..."perhaps" is the house. My whole life I waited and waited in so many houses for the real one to come. It always seemed just around the corner, but the distance remained the same. It remained always just around the corner -- I can again see it.
I know that no house is ever going to be mine; but knowing is one thing: once in a while, something which can only be called "being" covers it. I call that "all-knowing"; and in those moments, again I am searching for "the home." I said it can be named only "perhaps"; I mean that is the name of the home. It is always going to happen, but never really happens... always just about to happen.
From my Nani's house I moved to my father's sister's house. The husband, I mean my father's brother-in-law, was not very willing. Naturally, why should he be? I was in perfect agreement with him.
Even if I had been in his place I would not have been willing either. Not only unwilling, but stubbornly unwilling, because who would accept a trouble-maker unnecessarily? They were childless, so really living happily -- although in fact they were very unhappy, not knowing how "happy" those who have children are. But they had no way of knowing either.
They had a beautiful bungalow, with more room than for just one couple. It was big enough to have many people in it. But they were rich people, they could afford it. It was not a problem for them to just give me a small room, although the husband was, without saying a word, unwilling. I refused to move in.
I stood outside their house with my small suitcase, and told my father's sister that, "Your husband is unwilling to have me here, and unless he is willing it would be better for me to live on the street than to be in his house. I cannot enter unless I am convinced that he will be happy to have me. And I cannot promise that I will not be a trouble to you. It is against my nature to not be in trouble. I am just helpless."
The husband was hidden behind a curtain, listening to everything. He understood one thing at least, that the boy was worth trying.
He came out and said, "I will give you a try."
I said, "Rather you learn from the very beginning that I am giving you a try."
He said, "What!"
I said, "The meaning will become clearer slowly. It enters thick skulls very slowly."
The wife was shocked. Later on she said to me, "You should not say such a thing to my husband because he can throw you out. I cannot prevent him; I am only a wife, and a childless one."
Now, you cannot understand... in India, a childless wife is thought to be a curse. She may not be responsible herself, and I know perfectly well that this fellow was responsible, because the doctors told me that he was impotent. But in India, if you are a childless woman....
First, just to be a woman in India, and then to be childless! Nothing worse can happen to anybody. Now if a woman is childless, what can she do about it? She can go to a gynecologist... but not in India! The husband would rather marry another woman.
And the Indian law, made of course by men, allows a husband to marry another woman if the first wife remains childless. Strange, if two people are involved in conceiving a child, then naturally, two people are involved in not-conceiving too. In India, two people are involved in conceiving, but in not-conceiving... only one, the woman.
I lived in that house, and naturally, from the very beginning, a conflict, a subtle current arose between me and the husband, and it continued to grow. It erupted in many ways. First, each and every thing he said, in my presence, I immediately contradicted it, whatsoever it was. What he said was immaterial. It was not a question of right or wrong: it was him or me.
From the beginning the way he looked at me decided how I had to look at him -- as an enemy. Now, Dale Carnegie may have written HOW TO WIN FRIENDS AND INFLUENCE PEOPLE, but I don't think that he really knows. He cannot. Unless you know the art of creating enemies, you cannot know the art of creating friends. In that, I am immensely fortunate.
I have created so many enemies that you can depend on it, that I must have made a few friends at least. Without creating friends, you cannot create enemies. That is a basic law. If you want friends, get ready for the enemies too. That's why many, the majority of people, decide to have neither friends nor enemies, just acquaintances. These are thought to be common-sense people; in fact they really have uncommon sense. But I don't have that, whatsoever it is called. I created as many friends as I created enemies, in fact, in the same proportion. I can count on them both. They are both reliable.
The first, of course, was his guru. The moment he entered the house I told my father's sister, "This man is the worst I have ever seen."
She said, "Shut up. Keep quiet, he is my husband's guru."
I said, "Let him be, but tell me: am I right or not?"
She said, "Unfortunately you are, but keep quiet."
I said, "I cannot keep quiet. We have to come to a confrontation."
She said, "I knew that once this man comes there is going to be trouble."
I said, "He is not responsible. I am the trouble. The day you accepted me, remember, I told your husband, `Remember, you can accept me, but you are accepting trouble.' Now he will know what I meant. There are things which only time can reveal -- a dictionary is useless."
The moment he seated himself, pompously of course, I touched his head. Now, that was the beginning, just the beginning. My relatives all gathered and said, "What are you doing? Do you know who he is?"
I said, "I did it just to know who he is. I was trying to measure him, but he is very shallow. He does not even reach up to his feet, that's why I touched his head."
But he was all fire, jumping and crying and shouting, "This is an insult!"
I said, "I am simply quoting from your book." He had recently published a book in which he had said, "When somebody insults you, be silent, be quiet, don't be disturbed."
He then said, "What about my book?"
That helped me a little, and I then said, "Sit down in your chair, although you don't deserve it."
He said, "Again! Are you bent on insulting me?"
I said, "I am not bent on insulting anybody. I am just thinking of the chair."
He was so fat that the poor chair was somehow just managing to hold him up. The poor chair was actually crying, and making noises.
I said, "I'm just talking about the chair. I am not concerned about you, but I am concerned about the chair because later on I will have to use it. In fact it is my chair. If you don't behave, you will have to vacate it."
This was almost like setting light under a bomb. He jumped up, shouting vulgarities, and said, "I always knew the moment this child entered this house it would no longer be the same."
I said, "At least that is true. Whenever there is truth I will always agree, even with an enemy. The house is no longer the same, that is true. Go ahead, tell us why it is not the same."
He said, "Because you are godless."
In India, the word for godless is nastika, which is a beautiful word. It cannot be translated as "godless" although that is the only available translation. nastika simply means "one who does not believe." It does not say anything about the object of belief or disbelief. It is tremendously significant, at least for me. I would like to be called nastika, "one who does not believe," because only the blind ones believe. Those who can see, they need not believe.
The Indian word for the believer is astika; like "theist" it exactly gives you the sense of "the believer." In the Indian language a theist is called astika -- one who believes, the believer.
I have never been a believer, and nobody who has any intelligence can ever be a believer. Belief is for the imbeciles, the retarded, the idiots, and that lot -- and it is a big company, in fact it is the majority.
He called me nastika.
I said, "I again agree, because it describes my attitude towards life. Perhaps it will always describe my attitude towards life, because to believe is to limit. To believe is to be arrogant; to believe is to believe that you know."
To be nastika simply says, "I do not know." It is exactly the English word "agnostic," "one who does not believe." Nor can he say that he does not believe; in fact he simply remains with a question mark. A man with a question mark, that is an agnostic.
Carrying one's cross is not very difficult, particularly if it is made of gold and studded with diamonds, and hanging around your neck. It is so easy. It was difficult for Jesus. It was not a drama; it was a real cross. And Jesus was not a Christian; and the Jews were really angry. Ordinarily they are good people, and when good people get angry then something nasty is bound to happen, because all good people repress their nastiness. When it explodes, it is an atomic explosion! Jews are always nice people; that is their only fault.
If they had been a little less nice, Jesus need not have gone to the cross. But they were so nice, they had to crucify him. They were really crucifying themselves; their own son, their very blood -- and not an ordinary son, their very best. Jews have not produced, neither before, nor after, anyone who even resembles, or even comes close to Jesus. They should have loved the man, but they were nice guys, that was the trouble. They could not forgive him.
I have been with many saints, so-called of course, and a few really saintly, but I will not call them saints. The word has fallen into wrong company, and become foul. I will not call Pagal Baba a saint, nor call Magga Baba a saint, nor Masta Baba a saint -- just sages. Saintly certainly, but not in the ordinary way people think of saints.
My uncle's guru, Hari Baba, was thought to be a saint. I said to him, "You are neither a Baba, nor a Hari. Hari is the name of God; please change your name to something that applies to you. Baba has no reference to you either. Just look in the dictionary and find something that makes some sense." The conflict started and continued. I will tell you about it later on.
From this house I moved to a university hostel, then to a small house when I went into service. But the house was small, and the family so good that I felt continuously embarrassed, because I could even hear what they were saying in their bed. Now, it is not right, but in the middle of one night I had to say, "Please excuse me, I can hear you."
They were, of course, very shocked. In the morning they said, "You have to leave the house."
I said, "I know. Look, I have already packed everything." I had packed. In fact I had brought a vehicle, and my things were already being loaded.
They said, "This is strange, we had not yet said anything to you."
I said, "You may not have said anything to me, but I heard everything that you were saying to your wife, in bed. The wall is so thin. It is not your fault. What can you do? But what can I do either? I tried hard not to hear you."
And do you know that even today I have to sleep with ear plugs. Those ear plugs started after that night. It was long ago. It must have been somewhere in 1958, or perhaps the end of 1957, but somewhere around there. I started using ear plugs just so as not to hear what was not meant for me. It had cost me a house, but I left immediately.
I have been continuously leaving, always packing for the new house. In a way it was good, otherwise I would have had nothing else to do, just packing and then unpacking, then again packing and unpacking; it kept me more occupied than any other Buddha before, and more harmlessly. They too were occupied, but their occupation implied others.
My occupation has always been, in a certain sense, personal. Even if thousands of people are with me it is still a one to one relationship between you and me. It is not an organization, and it can never be. Certainly for managerial purposes it has to function as an organization, but as far as my sannyasins are concerned, each single sannyasin is related to me, and only to me, not via anybody else.
I am a very unoccupied man. I cannot say unemployed, hence I have used the word "unoccupied," because I rejoice in it. I am not applying for any employment. I am finished with all employment. I am just enjoying. But to enjoy a certain milieu is needed; that's what I am creating.
The whole of my life I have been creating it, gradually, in steps. I have spoken again and again about the new commune. It is just to remind myself, not you, so that I don't forget the new commune. Because the moment that I forget it, I may not wake up the next morning.
Gudia will wait.... You will run; yes, I have seen you coming, almost running. You will wait, but I will not be coming because I will have lost the only small thread with which I was holding myself.
And this was going on and on. From Gadarwara I moved to Jabalpur. In Jabalpur I changed houses so many times that everybody wondered if it was my hobby, changing houses.
I said, "Yes, it helps you to become acquainted with so many people in different localities, and I love to be acquainted."
They said, "It is a strange hobby, and very difficult too. Only twenty days have passed and you are moving again."
And from Jabalpur finally to Bombay.... In Bombay too I moved from one locality to another. This went on until I ended it here, in Poona. Nobody knows where next.
It started with my school, and it is just the second day. Life is so multidimensional. When I say so multidimensional, it may look absurd because just multidimensional covers it. Why call it so multidimensional? Life is multi-multidimensional.
You must be feeling hungry, and hungry ghosts are dangerous people. Just two minutes for me....
Just end it now.
Okay.
I wanted to tell you a simple truth, perhaps forgotten
for its simplicity; and no religion can practice it
because the moment you become part of a religion you are
no longer simple nor religious. I wanted to tell you
just a very simple thing which I have learned the hard
way. Perhaps you are getting it too cheap, and the
simple is generally mistaken for the cheap. It is not
cheap at all. It is the costliest thing possible because
one has to pay for this simple truth with one's own
life. It is surrender, trust.
Naturally you will misunderstand trust. How many times
have I told you? Yes, I must have told you millions of
times, but have you listened even once? Just the other
night my secretary was crying, and I asked why.
She said, "The reason for my tears is that you
trust me so much, and I am not worthy of it. It is too
unbearable."
I said, "I trust you. Now if you want to cry again,
you can cry. If you want to laugh, you can laugh."
Now this is certainly difficult for her. She understands
me, but her tears were not against me, they were for me.
I said to her, "What can you do? At the most you
can tell me to leave this house. Anyone who wants to
come with me from this house will come, otherwise I will
go alone. Alone I have come; alone I will have to go.
Nobody can accompany me on the real journey. In the
meantime you can play all kinds of games just to pass
the time."
She looked at me. Her tears had dried but were still
there on her cheeks. For a moment I knew what was in her
mind. I said to her, "You are thinking that now you
can cheat me. Okay, you will not find a better
opportunity."
She started crying again and falling at my feet saying,
"No, Osho, no. I don't want to cheat you. That's
why I was crying. I don't want to cheat you."
I said, "Then why the idea? If you don't want to,
and I don't want you to either, then why are we wasting
our time? If you want to cheat me, I am willing. In fact
I should cry for you because from the very beginning I
have been nothing but a problem. And still I am a
problem, not to myself -- myself, I am not at all, so
the question does not arise. But to others who are, and
are very much so... the more they are, the more
problematic is their life. But you are with a man who is
not. And as far as he is concerned he has no problem.
And if he can trust you, existence is enough to take
care of you."
But nobody seems to be at all interested in existence --
in everything except existence.
That brings Masto back again. This Masto is such a
fellow he would enter anywhere -- asked, unasked,
invited, uninvited. He was so interesting that whether
he was invited or not, everybody would stand to receive
him. Masto comes in again and again. It is just an old
habit which is very difficult to cure.
Now poor Devageet simply writes his notes, and he does
it perfectly. Once in a while I check by asking,
"What was I saying?" and he reminds me exactly
what it was that I was saying. He does his work, and
because he is so full of love for me he cannot resist
sighing, and breathing as if something he could never
believe would happen has at last happened -- and he
cannot believe it still. And my difficulty is that I
think that he is giggling! He is not giggling, just the
sound of his excited breathing makes me feel that he is
giggling.
He has written to me about it. I know it, but whenever
he does it -- I am also a diehard -- immediately the
word that comes to me is giggling. So, again he is
giggling. This too is an old habit from when I was a
professor. And you can understand: a professor is, after
all, a professor, and he cannot allow giggling in his
class. I don't mind it now, I enjoy it.
In my class there were more girls than boys, so there
was much giggling. And you know me, whether they are
boys or girls it does not matter: I still share the
jokes. But if the giggling is out of place, then the
person is bound to be in trouble. Just after the joke
there is a moment when I would allow it, but not out of
place. If the giggling came out of place then I would
catch the person redhanded. Such giggling was not
because of any joke, it was just because of boys and
girls together; the old story of Adam and Eve.
"Just get out, both of you!" That's what God
said. "Get out of the garden of Eden!"
He must have been the old kind of teacher. And this
serpent must have been just an old servant who had
served many Adams and Eves, helping in every possible
way, perhaps sending their letters to each other et
cetera. It is better not to mention the other things. Of
course there are no ladies here, and no gentlemen
either; but just in case somebody is a gentleman
pretending not to be, or a lady pretending not to be,
then there would be unnecessary pain. I don't want to
cause pain to anybody.
I remember my first lecture.... See how things happen in
this series? It was in high school. All the high schools
in the district had sent a speaker there. I was chosen
to be the representative of my school, not because I was
the best, I cannot say that, but only because I was the
most troublesome. If I had not been chosen there would
have been trouble, that much was certain. So, they
decided to choose me, but they were not aware that
wherever I am trouble starts anyway.
I started the speech without the normal address to
"Mister President, Ladies and Gentlemen...." I
looked the president up and down, and said to myself,
"No, he does not look like a president." Then
I looked around and said to myself, "No, nobody
here seems to be either a lady or a gentleman, so
unfortunately I have to begin my speech without
addressing anybody in particular. I can only say, `To
whom it may concern.'"
Later on my principal called me, because I had still won
the prize, even after this.
He said, "What happened to you? You behaved
strangely. We prepared you but you never said a single
word that you were taught. Not only that, you completely
forgot the prepared lecture; you did not even address
the president or the ladies or gentlemen."
I said, "I looked around, and there were no
gentlemen. I knew all those fellows very well, not one
is a gentleman. As far as the ladies are concerned, they
are even worse because they are the wives of these same
fellows. And the president... he seems to have been sent
by God to preside over all the meetings in this town. I
am tired of him. I cannot call him `Mister President'
when in fact I would rather have hit him."
On that day when the president had called me for my
prize, I said, "Okay, but remember you will have to
come down here and shake hands with me."
He said, "What! Shake hands with you! I will never
even look at you. You insulted me."
I said, "I will show you."
Since that day he became my enemy. I know the art of how
to make enemies. His name was Shri Nath Bhatt, a
prominent politician in the town. Of course he was the
leader of the most influential Gandhian political party.
Those were the days when India was under the British Raj.
Perhaps as far as freedom is concerned India is still
not free. It may be free from the British Raj, but not
free from the bureaucracy which the British Raj created.
I have really always been talking about trust, and I
have never been able to explain it. Perhaps it is not my
fault. Trust: perhaps it cannot be talked about, only
indicated. I have been trying hard to say something very
definite, but everything fails. Either it becomes your
experience, then you don't need to know what it is; or
it does not become your experience, then you may know
everything under the heading "trust," but
still you know nothing.
I was again trying to tell you, in fact giving myself
one more try, perhaps; and it is always alluring to talk
about all the attempts, even those that failed. Just
knowing that they were made in the right direction, one
feels proud. It is a question of direction.
Yes, trust is many things, but first a question towards
oneself -- a change of direction.
We are born looking outwardly. To look inside is not
part of the body organism. The body functions well; if
you want to go somewhere else, it can take you. But the
moment you ask "Who am I?" it flops, simply
flops on the ground, not knowing what to do now because
the relevant direction is not part of the so-called
world.
The world consists of ten dimensions, or ten directions,
rather. Dimension is a bigger word and should not be
used for direction. These ten directions are: two,
upwards and downwards; and the four we know as east,
west, north, and south; the remaining four are just the
corners. When you draw the east-west line, the
north-south line, there are corners between the north
and the east, and between the east and the south, and so
on -- the four corners.
I should not have used the word dimension. It is totally
different, as different as Devageet's sneeze. He tries
to suppress it, and it is one of the most impossible
things to suppress. I will suggest to him to allow it.
It comes anyway. Why suffer? Next time when you hear the
knock, open the door and say, "Madam, come
in." Perhaps it may not happen at all. Sneezes are
strange things. If you try to bring one on then you will
have to do all the tricks of yoga. Then too, it is only
a probability. But try to suppress it and it will come
on with tremendous force. It is a woman you know; and
when a woman takes possession of you it is better to
sneeze her out and escape, rather than suppress.
Direction and dimension are as different as his sneeze,
and my understanding that he is giggling. He is trying
to suppress his sneeze and I was just starting to talk
about the untalkable, and at that exact moment he
sneezed. This is what Carl Gustav Jung calls
synchronicity. Not a very great example; not exemplary I
mean, but just a little example.
It is strange, but particularly in India, whenever such
things are talked about -- and I don't think people have
talked about such things anywhere else for thousands of
years -- sneezing at a meeting with the Master is
prohibited. Why? I don't understand how you can prohibit
a sneeze. A sneeze is not afraid of your cops, nor your
guns. How can you prohibit it? -- unless you do plastic
surgery on the nose, which would not be good because a
sneeze simply informs you that something wrong has
entered. It should not be prevented in any way.
So I say to you, Devageet, you are my disciple, and my
disciples have to be different in every way, even in
sneezing. They can sneeze exactly when the Master is
talking about trust. There is no harm in it. But
sometimes when you start repressing it, naturally it
affects your breathing. It affects everything in you,
and then I think that you are giggling. Then you are
very shocked. In fact you should be happy that "My
Master, even if he misunderstands once in a while,
always interprets it as a giggle."
Laughter -- that can be said to be my creed if it is
allowed; I mean if the word "creed" is allowed
to be used. I don't mean a loud laughter allowed... that
will be okay with me. But people are such fanatics about
their creeds, they don't laugh. At least in church they
have such long faces that you cannot believe they have
come there to understand the man whose only message if
reduced to one word would be, "Rejoice!" They
are not the people to rejoice.
They must have been the people who killed the man, and
are still putting fresh nails into his coffin. Who
knows, he may come out.... They must be the people who
are still hanging him; and he has been dead for two
thousand years. Now there is no need to hang him,
although he was intelligent enough not to be crucified.
He managed to escape just in time. Of course he played
the role of being crucified, for the masses, and when
the masses went home, he also went home. I don't mean he
went to God. Please don't misunderstand; he really went
to his home.
The cave which is still shown to Christians, where
Jesus' body was kept, is all nonsense. Yes, it was there
for a few hours, perhaps a night at the most, but he was
still alive. This is proved by the BIBLE itself. It says
that a soldier pierced Jesus' side with a spear after
they thought he was dead, but blood came out. Blood
never comes out of a dead man. The moment a man dies his
blood starts disintegrating. If the BIBLE had said only
water had come out then I would have believed that they
were writing truly, but it would have looked so stupid
to write that water came out of his body. In fact Jesus
never died in Jerusalem. He died in Pahalgam, which at
least as far as the meaning of the word is concerned
means exactly the same as the name of my village.
Pahalgam is one of the most beautiful places in the
world. That is where Jesus died, and he died at the age
of one hundred and twelve. But he got so fed up with his
own people that he simply spread the story that he had
died on the cross.
Of course he was crucified -- but you have to understand
that the Jewish way of crucifixion was not the American
way. It was not sitting in a chair, and with just a push
of a button you were no more; not even time to say,
"God forgive these people who are pushing the
button, they don't know what they are doing." They
know what they are doing! They are pushing the button!
And you don't know what they are doing!
Jesus would not have had any time if he had been
crucified in the scientific way. No, it is a very crude
way that the Jews followed. Naturally, it sometimes even
took twenty-four hours or more to die. There have been
cases of people having survived for three days on the
cross, the Jewish cross I mean, because they simply
nailed the man by his hands and his feet.
The blood has the capacity to clot; it flows for a
while, then it clots. The man is, of course, in immense
pain, in fact he prays to God, "Please let it be
finished." Perhaps that is what Jesus was saying
when he said, "They don't know what they are doing.
Why have you forsaken me?" But the pain must have
been too much, for he finally said, "Let thy will
be done."
I don't think that he died on the cross. No, I should
not say that "I don't think..." I know that he
didn't die on the cross. He had said, "Let thy will
be done"; that's his freedom. He could say anything
he wanted to say. In fact, the Roman governor, Pontius
Pilate, had fallen in love with the man. Who would not?
It is irresistible if you have eyes.
But Jesus' own people were busy counting money; they had
no time to look into the eyes of this man who had no
money at all. Pontius Pilate for one moment had even
thought to release Jesus. It was in his power to order
his release, but he was afraid of the crowd. Pilate
said, "It is better that I should keep out of their
business. He is a Jew, they are Jews -- let them decide
for themselves. But if they cannot decide in his favor
then I will find a way."
And he found a way, politicians always do. Their ways
are always roundabout; they never go directly. If they
want to go to A, they first go to B; that's how politics
works. And it really works. Only once in a while it does
not work. I mean, only when there is a non-political
man, then it does not work. In Jesus' case also, Pontius
Pilate managed perfectly well without getting involved.
Jesus was crucified on the afternoon of Friday, hence
"Good Friday." Strange world! Such a good man
is crucified, and you call it "Good Friday."
But there was a reason, because Jews have... I think
Devageet, you can help me again -- not with a sneeze, of
course! Is Saturday their religious day?
"Yes, Osho."
Right... because on Saturday nothing is done. Saturday
is a holiday for the Jews; all action has to be stopped.
That's why the Friday was chosen... and late afternoon,
so by the time the sun sets the body has to be brought
down, because to keep it hanging on Saturday would be
"action." That's how politics functions, not
religion. During that night, a rich follower of Jesus
removed the body from the cave. Of course, then comes
Sunday, a holiday for everybody. By the time Monday
comes, Jesus is very far away.
Israel is a small country; you can cross it on foot in
twenty-four hours very easily. Jesus escaped, and there
was no better place than the Himalayas. Pahalgam is just
a small village, just a few cottages. He must have
chosen it for its beauty. Jesus chose a place which I
would have loved myself.
I tried continuously for twenty years to get into
Kashmir. But Kashmir has a strange law: only Kashmiris
can live there, not even other Indians. That is strange.
But I know ninety percent of Kashmiris are Mohammedan
and they are afraid that once Indians are allowed to
live there, then Hindus would soon become the majority,
because it is part of India. So now it is a game of
votes just to prevent the Hindus.
I am not a Hindu, but bureaucrats everywhere are
delinquents. They really need to be in mental hospitals.
They would not allow me to live there. I even met the
chief minister of Kashmir, who was known before as the
prime minister of Kashmir.
It was such a great struggle to bring him down from
prime ministership to chief ministership. And naturally,
in one country how could there be two prime ministers?
But he was a very reluctant man, this Sheikh Abdullah.
He had to be imprisoned for years. Meanwhile the whole
constitution of Kashmir was changed, but that strange
clause remained in it. Perhaps all the committee members
were Mohammedans and none of them wanted anybody else to
enter Kashmir.
I tried hard, but there was no way. You cannot enter
into the thick skulls of politicians.
I said to the sheikh, "Are you mad? I am not a
Hindu; you need not be afraid of me. And my people come
from all over the world -- they will not influence your
politics in any way, for or against."
He said, "One has to be cautious."
I said, "Okay, be cautious and lose me and my
people."
Poor Kashmir could have gained so much, but politicians
are born deaf. He listened, or at least pretended to,
but he did not hear.
I said to him, "You know that I have known you for
many years, and I love Kashmir."
He said, "I know you, that's why I am even more
afraid. You are not a politician, you belong to a
totally different category. We always distrust such
people as you." He used this word, distrust -- and
I was talking to you about trust.
At this moment I cannot forget Masto. It was he who
introduced me to Sheikh Abdullah, a very long time
before. Later on, when I wanted to enter Kashmir,
particularly Pahalgam, I reminded the sheikh of this
introduction.
The sheikh said, "I remember that this man was also
dangerous, and you are even more so. In fact it is
because you were introduced to me by Masta Baba that I
cannot allow you to become a permanent resident in this
valley."
Masto introduced me to many people. He thought perhaps I
might need them; and I certainly did need them -- not
for myself but for my work. But except for very few
people, the majority turned out to be very cowardly.
They all said, "We know you are
enlightened...."
I said, "Stop, then and there. That word, from your
mouth, immediately becomes unenlightened. Either you do
what I say, or simply say no, but don't talk any
nonsense to me."
They were very polite. They remembered Masta Baba, and a
few of them even remembered Pagal Baba, but they were
not ready to do anything at all for me. I am talking
about the majority. Yes, a few were helpful, perhaps one
percent of the hundreds of people that Masto introduced
me to. Poor Masto -- his desire was that I should never
be in any difficulty or need, and that I could always
depend on the people he had introduced me to.
I said to him, "Masto, you are trying your best,
and I am even doing better than that by keeping quiet
when you introduce me to these fools. If you were not
there I would have caused real trouble. That man for
instance, would never have forgotten me. I control
myself just because of you, although I don't believe in
control, but I do it just for your sake."
Masto laughed and said, "I know. When I look at you
as I am introducing you to a bigwig, I laugh inside
myself thinking, `My God, how much effort you must be
making not to hit that idiot.'"
Sheikh Abdullah took so much effort, and yet he said to
me, "I would have even allowed you to live in
Kashmir if you had not been introduced to me by Masta
Baba."
I asked the sheikh, "Why?... when you appeared to
be such an admirer."
He said, "We are no one's admirer, we admire only
ourselves, but because he had a following --
particularly among rich people in Kashmir -- I had to
admire him. I used to receive him at the airport, and
give him a send-off, put all my work aside and just run
after him. But that man was dangerous. And if he
introduced you to me, then you cannot live in Kashmir,
at least while I am in power. Yes, you can come and go,
but only as a visitor."
It is good that Jesus entered Kashmir before Sheikh
Abdullah. He did well by coming two thousand years
before. He must have been really afraid of Sheikh
Abdullah. Jesus' grave is still there, preserved by the
descendants of those who had followed him from Israel.
Of course men like me cannot go alone, you can
understand. A few people must have followed him there.
Even though he went far away from Israel, they must have
gone with him.
In fact the Kashmiris are the lost tribe of Hebrews of
which the Jews and Christians both talk so much. The
Kashmiris are not Hindu, nor of Indian origin. They are
Jewish. You can see by looking at Indira Gandhi's nose;
she is a Kashmiri.
She is imposing emergency rule in India -- not in name
but in fact. Hundreds of political leaders are behind
bars. I had been telling her from the very beginning
that those people should not be in parliament or
assemblies or in the legislature.
There are many kinds of idiots, but politicians are the
worst, because they also have power. Journalists are
number two. In fact they are even worse than
politicians, but because they have no power, they can
only write, and who cares what they write? Without power
in your hands then you may have as much idiocy as
possible, it cannot do anything.
I was introduced to Indira too by Masto, but in an
indirect way. Basically Masto was a friend of Indira's
father, Jawaharlal Nehru, the first prime minister of
India. He was really a beautiful man, and a rare one
too, because to be in politics and yet remain beautiful
is not easy.
When Helen Keller met him, because she was blind, deaf
and dumb, she had to touch his face. She gave the
message to someone who could interpret her sign
language, "Touching this man's face I feel as if I
am touching a marble statue."
Many other people have written about Jawaharlal, but I
don't think anything more needs to be said. This woman
with no eyes, no ears and no tongue to speak with, still
managed to say the most poignant statement, and in a
very simple way.
It was my feeling also, when I was introduced by Masto.
I was only twenty. After only one more year Masto was to
leave me, so he was in a hurry to introduce me to
everybody that he could. He rushed me to the prime
minister's house. It was a beautiful meeting. I had not
expected it to be beautiful because I had been
disappointed so many times. How could I have expected
that the prime minister would not just be a mean
politician? He was not.
It was only by chance that, in the corridor as we were
leaving and he was coming with us to say goodbye, Indira
came in. At that time she was nobody, just a young girl.
She was introduced to me by her father. Masto was
present, of course, and it was through him that we met.
But Indira may not have known Masto, or who knows? --
maybe she did. The meeting with Jawaharlal turned out to
be so significant that it changed my whole attitude, not
only to him, but to his family too.
He talked with me about freedom, about truth. I could
not believe it. I said, "Do you recognize the fact
that I am only twenty years old, just a young man?"
He said, "Don't be bothered about age, because my
experience is that a donkey, even if it is very old,
still remains a donkey. An old donkey does not
necessarily become a horse -- nor even a mule, what to
say of a horse. So don't you bother about age," he
continued. "We can forget completely for a moment
how old I am and how old you are, and let us discuss
without any barriers of age, caste, creed, or
position." He then said to Masto, "Baba, would
you please close the door so that nobody enters in. I
don't even want my own private secretary."
And we talked of such great things. It was I who was
surprised, because he listened to me with as much
attention as you. And he had such a beautiful face, as
only the Kashmiris can have. Indians are certainly a
little dark, and the more you move downwards towards the
south, the darker they become until finally you come to
a point when you see, for the first time in your life,
what black means.
But Kashmiris are really beautiful. Jawaharlal certainly
was, for two reason. My own feeling is that the white
man, just a white man, looks a little shallow because
whiteness has no depth. That's why all the Californian
girls are trying to get their skins a little sun-tanned.
They understand that when the skin is sun-tanned it
starts having a certain depth which white skin cannot
have. But black is too sun-tanned, burned. There is no
question of depth, it is death. But Kashmiris are
exactly in the middle; they are white people, very
beautiful people, sun-tanned from their very birth; and
they are Jews.
I have seen Jesus' grave in Kashmir, where he escaped to
after his so-called crucifixion. I say so-called because
it was managed so well. The whole credit goes to Pontius
Pilate. And when Jesus was allowed to escape from the
cave, naturally the whole question was, "Where to
go?" The only place outside Israel where he could
be at ease was Kashmir, because it was a small Israel.
And it is not only Jesus who is buried in Kashmir, but
Moses too.
That will shock you even more. I have been to his grave
too. I am a grave-digger. Moses had been nagged by other
Jews asking, "Where is the lost tribe?"
One tribe was missing, naturally, after their forty
years' long journey in the desert. Moses mismanaged that
too; if he had gone to the left instead of to the right,
the Jews would have been the oil kings now. But Jews are
Jews, you cannot predict what they will do. Moses
traveled for forty years from Egypt to Israel.
I am neither a Jew nor a Christian, and it is none of my
concern, but still, just out of curiosity, I wonder why
he chose Israel. Why did Moses search for Israel? In
fact he must have been searching for a beautiful place,
but old age comes, and after a tedious journey, forty
years in the desert....
I could not have done it. Forty years! I cannot do it
for even forty hours. I cannot. I would rather commit
hara-kiri. You know hara-kiri? It is the Japanese way of
disappearing; in ordinary language, suicide.
Moses traveled for forty years and ultimately came to
Israel, and that dusty, ugly place, Jerusalem. And after
all this -- Jews are Jews -- they nagged him to travel
again in search of the lost tribe. My own feeling is
that he went just to get rid of these fellows. But where
to look? The most beautiful place that was close was the
Himalayas, and he reached the same valley.
It is good that Moses and Jesus both died in India.
India is neither Christian, and certainly not Jewish --
but the man, or the families to be exact, who take care
of the two graves, are Jewish. And both graves are made
in the Jewish way. Hindus do not make graves, as you
know. Mohammedans do, but in a different way. A
Mohammedan grave has to point towards Mecca. The head
has to be towards Mecca. These are the only two graves
in Kashmir which are not made according to the
Mohammedan rules.
But the names are certainly not exactly what you might
expect. In Arabic, Moses is called Mosha; and the name
on his grave is Mosha. Jesus in Arabic is just the same
in Aramaic, Yeshu, from the Hebrew Joshua; and it is
written in the same way. It may mislead you. You might
think Yeshu is not Jesus, nor that Mosha is Moses. Moses
is only an English -- what to say? -- mispronunciation
of the original; just as Jesus is.
Joshua will certainly slowly become Yeshu -- Joshua is
too much; Yeshu will do, and that is exactly how we call
Jesus in India, Isu -- pronounced Eesu. We have added
something to the beauty of the name. "Jesus"
is good, but you know what has been made out of it. When
one wants to curse, one says, "Jesus!" The
sound certainly has something cursing in it. Try to
curse somebody by saying, "Joshua!" and you
will find difficulty. The word itself prevents you. It
is so feminine, so beautiful, and so round that you
cannot hit anybody with it.
What's the time?
"Twenty past eleven, Osho."
That's good, finish it.
Devageet, I think you are being affected by something. You have to be unaffected. Right?
"Right."
Otherwise who is going to write the notes? The writer has to be, at least, the writer.
Okay.
These tears are for you, that's why they are on the right side. Ashu missed. A little one is coming on the left for her also. I cannot be too hard. Unfortunately I have only got two eyes, and there is Devaraj, for whom I will weep from both eyes together. He is of those few for whom I have been waiting, and not in vain. That is not my way. When I wait, it has to happen. If it does not happen, that only means that I was not really waiting, nothing else. Now, back to the story.
I never wanted to meet Pandit Jawaharlal Nehru, the father of Indira Gandhi, for two reasons. I had told Masto, but he would not listen. He was just the right man for me. Pagal Baba had really chosen the right man for a wrong man. I have never been right in anybody's eyes, but Masto was. Except for me, nobody knew he was laughing like a child. But that was a private affair, and there were many private things which I have to make public now.
We argued for days whether I should go to see the first prime minister of India. I was as reluctant as ever. The moment you ask me to go anywhere, even to God's house, I will say, "We will think it over," or, "We could invite Him for tea."
We argued to no end, but he not only understood the arguments, but who was arguing, and he was more concerned with that.
He said, "You can say whatever you like, but," as he always said when he could not convince me with rational argument, "Pagal Baba has told me to do this, so now it is up to you."
I said, "If you say that Pagal Baba told you, then let it be so. If he was alive I would not leave him in peace so easily, but he is no more, and one does not argue with a dead man, particularly a loved one."
He used to laugh and say, "What happened to your argument?"
I said, "Now, you shut your mouth up. The moment you bring Pagal Baba in, a dead man out of his grave, just to win an argument.... And you have not won either, I have simply given up. Do what you have been arguing about with me for these last three days."
But those arguments were tremendously beautiful, very minute, subtle and far reaching -- but that is not the point, at least not for today... perhaps in some other circle.
The thing Masto was insisting upon was that I should see the prime minister because one never knows, perhaps someday I might need his help. "And," I added, "perhaps...." (RATTLING NOISE FROM THE AIR CONDITIONER)
This is the devil I was telling you about, who types poor Devageet's notes during the night. Look, now he is typing directly. Even Ashu is laughing because she does not know what to do -- perhaps nobody knows.
(NOISE STOPS) Great! I had to stop talking myself, that's why he has stopped. If I speak again, unless something is done, he will start again. (RATTLING NOISE AGAIN) This is too much! Typing during the night, in the dark, is okay....
What was I saying?
"That Masto insisted you should meet the prime minister because one never knows, you may need his help one day."
I said to Masto, "Please make a small addition to it, that perhaps someday the prime minister may need my help. I am willing to go, because if Baba told you, then it is not so much trouble as having to disappoint the poor old Baba. Okay. But Masto, have you got the guts to also make the addition?"
Although a little hesitantly, he rose to his full height and said, "Yes, one day, not only perhaps but certainly, he or somebody else who occupies that chair is going to need your help. Now come with me."
I was only twenty at that time, and I asked Masto, "Have you told Jawaharlal my age? He is old, and the prime minister of one of the biggest democracies in the world, and of course he must have thousands of things on his mind. Has he got time for a boy like me? I mean a boy who is not even conventional; I mean, from a convent?"
I was really unconventional. First, I used to wear wooden sandals, which were a nuisance everywhere. In fact, they were a good declaration that I was coming, coming closer; the louder the noise, the closer I was.
My headmaster used to say, "Do whatsoever you want to do. Go and eat the apple again" -- he was a Christian that's why he said that -- "or, if you want to, eat the snake too! But for God's sake don't use those wooden sandals!"
I said to him, "Show me your rule book, the one you show me every time I do anything wrong. Is there any mention of wooden sandals in it?"
He said, "My God! Who would have thought that a student would turn up wearing wooden sandals? Of course there's no mention of it in my book."
I said, "Then you will have to inquire at the Ministry of Education, but until they pass a bill against using wooden sandals in school and let the whole world laugh at the foolishness of it, I'm not going to change. I am a very law-abiding person."
The headmaster said, "I know you are very law-abiding, at least in this matter you are. It is good that you don't insist that I should wear these wooden monsters too."
I said, "No. I am a very democratic man too, I never force anything on anybody. You could come naked, and I would not even ask, `Sir, where are your pants?'"
He said, "What!"
I said, "I am just saying `suppose,' the way you do when you come into class and say, `Suppose, just suppose....' I'm not saying that you should actually come naked... you don't have the guts to actually do it."
(RATTLING NOISE AGAIN) Only Asheesh can help, because perhaps the devil may understand Italian, and no other language. That's good. What was I saying?
"You were telling the headmaster that he didn't have the guts to come without his pants."
"Yes," I said to him; "it's only a supposition, just the way you say to the class `Suppose....' We never ask whether it is real or not, so don't ask me. Suppose you come without your pants; now I make some more additions, without a shirt, or even without your underwear...?"
He said, "You! Simply get out of here!"
I said, "I cannot, unless you tell me that I may use my wooden sandals. Wood is natural, and I am a non-violent man so I cannot use leather. So either I have to follow you, and use leather as you do -- although you call yourself a brahmin, but with those shoes, with what face can you call yourself a brahmin? -- or I have to use the wooden sandals."
He said, "Do whatsoever you want to do. Just go away as far as you can, as quickly as possible, because I may do something which I may repent my whole life."
I asked him, "Do you think you could kill me just because of my wooden sandals?"
He said, "No more questions, don't provoke me. But I must tell you that when I hear the sound" -- because all the floors in the school were paved with stone -- "I can hear you from anywhere in the building. In fact it is impossible not to hear you because you are continuously moving -- I don't know why -- and that noise just knocks me out of my senses."
I said, "That is your problem. I am going to use the sandals." And I used them until I left university. For my whole life, from high school to university, I used wooden sandals. Anybody could have told you about me because I was the only person with wooden sandals. Everybody used to say, "You can hear him from miles away."
I loved those wooden sandals. As far as I was concerned I loved them because I used to go for long walks, for miles, in the morning and at night. And with a wooden sandal... I don't think any of you has the experience of wooden sandals, but it sounds as if somebody is walking behind you, and although you know it is only your sandals making the noise, who knows? Perhaps, maybe... or, why take a chance? Just have a look. One wants to look back to see who is following. It took me years to train myself not to do such a stupid thing, and even longer not to even think of doing such a stupid thing.
I told Masto, "I have always been reluctant, even about things which anybody else would agree to easily."
But to say yes came to me very late. I went on saying no, no, until all the nos turned into a YES -- but I was not waiting for it.
Now, this has become a distraction. In fact, everything in this series is going to be a distraction of some sort, but I will try to come back again and again to the same point from where we were distracted.
I agreed. Masto and I went to the prime minister's house. I didn't know how many people respected Masto because I did not know much of the world anyway. I asked him on the way there, "Have you made an appointment?"
He laughed and didn't say anything. I thought to myself, "If he isn't worried, why should I be concerned? It is none of my business. I am only going with him."
But he needed no appointment; it became clear as we entered the gate. The policeman fell at his feet saying, "Masta Baba, you have not been for months, and we love to see you. Once in a while the prime minister needs your blessing."
Masto laughed but didn't say anything. We entered. The secretary touched his feet and said, "You should have just phoned and we would have sent you the prime minister's car. And who is this boy?"
Masto said, "I have brought this boy to be introduced only to Jawaharlal and to nobody else. And please remember, nothing about him is to be mentioned in any way."
Although he took every care, still my principle worked. I have told you the moment you create a friend, immediately you create an enemy. If you don't want the enemy then forget about the friends. That is the way of the monk, Buddhist and Christian; forgetting all about relationship, friendship and everything, so that you don't create enemies. But to just not create enemies is not the purpose of life.
You will be surprised as I was, but not that day -- only after many years.... That day it was not possible for me to recognize the man sitting in the secretary's office waiting for his appointment. I had not heard of him then, but he looked very arrogant. I thought he must be somebody powerful. I asked Masto, "Who is this man?"
Masto said, "Forget all about him; he is nothing of much value. He is Morarji Desai."
I said, "He is of no value?"
Masto said, "I mean, of any real value. He is just hocus-pocus. Of course he is a cabinet minister, and look at him, he is very angry because it is his time to be with the prime minister."
But Masto was known, and the prime minister called him first, and told Morarji Desai to wait. That was an insult, unintended on the part of Jawaharlal, but Morarji perhaps has not forgotten it even to this day. He may not remember the young boy, but he must be able to remember Masto. Masto was very impressive, in every way.
We went in, and it was not just for five minutes; it took us exactly one hour and thirty minutes. And Morarji Desai had to wait. Now, that was too much for him. It was his appointment, and somebody else, a sannyasin with a young boy entered before him... and then he had to wait for ninety minutes!
And for the first time in my life I was surprised, because I was not there to meet a poet, but a politician. I met a poet.
Jawaharlal was not a politician. Alas, he could not succeed in bringing his dreams to reality. But whether one says "alas" or "aha," a poet is always a failure. Even in his poetry he is a failure. To be a failure is his destiny, because he longs for the stars. He cannot be satisfied with the small, the finite. He wants to have the whole sky in his hands.
I was completely taken aback. Even Jawaharlal could see it, and he said, "What happened? The boy looks as if he has had a shock."
Masto, without even looking at me, said, "I know that boy. That's why I have brought him to you. In fact if it had been in my power, I would have taken you to him."
Now it was the turn for Jawaharlal to be taken aback... but he was a man of tremendous culture. He looked at me again, so that he could measure the meaning of Masto's words. For a moment we looked into each other's eyes, and we both laughed. And his laughter was not that of an old man, it was still that of a child. He was immensely beautiful, and when I say this, I mean it, because I have seen thousands of beautiful people; but I can say without hesitation, that he was the most beautiful of them all, and not only in his body.
It is strange; we talked of poetry, and Morarji was waiting outside. We talked of meditation, and Morarji was waiting outside. I can still see the scene -- he must have been fuming. In fact that day decided and sealed our enmity. Not from my side, of course; I have nothing against him. All his concerns are just stupid, not worth being against. Yes, once in a while he is good to laugh at. That's what I have done with his name, and his urine therapy -- drinking your own urine. He was in America preaching it. Nobody asks whether he drinks his own, or somebody else's, because when a person drinks urine he is already out of his senses, so that now he could drink anything -- what to say of somebody else's urine. And he was teaching there, sermonizing.
That day he became an enemy to me, but on my part at least, it was unknowingly. It was just because he had to wait for one and a half hours. He must have come to know who I was from the secretary, perhaps asking, "Who is that boy? And why is he being introduced to the prime minister? What is the purpose of it? And why is Masta Baba taking an interest in him?"
Of course, sitting there for one and a half hours you have to talk about something. I can understand it, but it was the most difficult thing for him to swallow -- even him, who can swallow his own urine. That's a great feat, but a greater thing to swallow than that was when he saw Jawaharlal come out to the porch just to say goodbye to this twenty-year-old boy.
At that moment he saw that it was not Masta Baba with whom the prime minister was speaking, but this strange, unknown boy with wooden sandals, making a noise all over the verandah -- it was a beautiful marble verandah. And I had long hair and a strange robe that I had made myself, because my sannyasins who now make my clothes were not there yet. Nobody was there....
I had made a very simple, long robe, with just two holes for the hands to come out whenever they were needed, and could go in whenever you wanted them in. I had made it myself. There was nothing artful in it. All that had been needed was just to sew a piece of cloth on two sides, and to cut a small neck hole.
Masto liked it, so he had somebody make one for him too.
I told him, "You should have asked me."
He said, "No, that would be too much. I would not be able to use it, because I would rather preserve it."
We came out of the house which was later to become famous as "Trimurti." It is now a museum to the memory of Jawaharlal. Jawaharlal was really great, in the sense that he need not have come out to give a send-off to a young boy, and to then stand there and close the door of the car, and wait until the car had left.
And all this was watched by this poor fellow, Morarji Desai. He is a cartoon, but that cartoon became my enemy for my whole life. Although he could not harm me in any way, he tried his best, I must say.
What's the time?
"Eight twenty-one, Osho."
Ten minutes for me, then I have to go to work. My office starts after this.
I am standing... strange, because I am supposed to be relaxing -- I mean in my memory I am standing with
Masto. Of course there is nobody with whom I would rather stand. After
Masto, with anybody else it would be poor, bound to be.
That man was really rich in every cell of his being, and in every fiber of his vast net of relationships that he slowly made me aware of. He never introduced me to the whole, that was not possible. I was in a hurry to do what I call not-doing. He was in a hurry to do what he called his responsibility towards me, as he had promised Pagal Baba. We were both in a hurry, so as much as he wanted to he could not make all his relationships available to me. There were other reasons also.
He was a traditional sannyasin, at least on the surface, but I knew him underneath. He was not traditional, only pretending to be because the crowds wanted that pretense. And only today can I understand how much he must have suffered. I have never suffered like that because I simply refused to pretend.
You cannot believe, but thousands of people were expecting from me something of their own imaginations. I had nothing to do with it. The Hindus, among my millions of followers -- I am talking about the days before I started my work -- they believed that I was
Kalki. Kalki is the Hindu avatar, the last.
I have to explain it a little, because it will help you to understand many things. In India, the ancient Hindus believed in only ten incarnations of God. Naturally -- those were the days when people used to count on their fingers -- ten was the ultimate. You could not go beyond ten; you had to begin again from one. That's why the Hindus believed that each cycle of existence has ten avatars. The word avatar means literally "descending of the divine." Ten, because after the tenth, one cycle, or circle, ends. Another immediately begins but then there is again a first avatar, and the story continues up to the tenth.
You will be able to understand me easily if you have seen poor Indian farmers counting. They count on their fingers up to the tenth, then they start again from one, two.... Ten must have been the primitive ultimate. It is strange that as far as languages are concerned, it still is. Beyond ten there isn't anything; eleven is a repetition. Eleven is just putting one behind one, making them married, putting them in trouble, that's all. After ten, all your numbers are just repetitions.
Why are the numbers up to ten so original? -- because everywhere man has counted on his fingers.
I should mention, by the way, before I go on-just a little distraction before I settle -- your words in English for one, two, three, four, five, six, seven, eight, nine, ten are all borrowed from Sanskrit.
Mathematics owes much to Sanskrit, because without these numbers there would have been no Albert Einstein, no atomic bomb either; no PRINCIPIA MATHEMATICA by Bertrand Russell and Whitehead. These numbers are the basic bricks.
And the foundations were laid down nowhere else but in the valleys of the Himalayas. Perhaps they encountered the immeasurable beauty and tried to measure it. Perhaps there was some other reason, but one thing is certain: that the Sanskrit word tri becomes three in English. It has just traveled the long, dusty journey of a word. The Sanskrit sasth becomes six in English; the Sanskrit asth becomes eight, and so on and so forth.
What was I saying?
"You were talking about the Hindus thinking you were the tenth incarnation of the avatar
Kalki."
Yes. You are doing well.
Kalki is the tenth and the last Hindu incarnation of God. After him the world ends -- and of course begins again; just as you demolish a house made of playing cards, then start afresh. Perhaps before starting you reshuffle the cards just to create a little enthusiasm in yourself. Otherwise what does it matter to the cards? But by reshuffling them you feel good.
Exactly like that, God reshuffles and starts thinking, "Perhaps this time I will do a little better." But every time, whatever He does, out comes Richard Nixon, Adolf Hitler, Morarji Desai.... I mean God fails every moment.
Yes, once in a while He does not fail, but perhaps the credit should go to man, because he succeeds in a world where everything is failing. Certainly the credit cannot be given to God. The world is enough proof that God is utterly discredited.
Hindus have continued to use ten as the ultimate since before the time of the RIG VEDA, that is about ten thousand years ago. But
Jainas, who are far more mathematical and logical and also older than the Hindus, never believed in the sanctity of ten. They had their own idea. Of course they also derived it from some source. If you cannot derive it from your own fingers somebody must have done it some other way, from some other source.
What the Jainas did has never been discussed clearly, and I cannot support it from any scripture, because I am mentioning it perhaps for the first time. I am adding "perhaps," in case somebody may have done it before and I do not know about it. But I know almost all the scriptures that are worth knowing. I simply ignored the others. But still, I may have ignored somebody in the crowd who should not have been ignored. Hence I used the word "perhaps," otherwise I am certain that nobody has said it before. So let us say it now.
The Jainas believe in twenty-four Masters, tirthankaras as they call them. Tirthankara is a beautiful word; it means "one who makes a place for your boat from where it can take you towards the other shore." That is the meaning of
tirth, and tirthankara means "one who makes such a place from which many, many people can go to the other shore; the further shore." But they believe in twenty-four. Their creation is also a circle, but a bigger one, naturally. Hindus have a small circle of ten; Jainas have a bigger circle of twenty-four. The radius is bigger.
Even Hindus, without knowing what they were doing, became impressed by the number twenty-four because Jainas would tell them, "You have only ten? -- we have twenty-four." Just like a child's psychology: "How big is your daddy? Only five feet? My daddy is six feet. Nobody is bigger than my daddy" -- and this "god" is nothing but a form of daddy.
Jesus was exactly right; he used to call Him Abba, which can only be translated as "daddy," not "God." You can understand it -- Abba is just a word of love and respect; "father" is not.
The moment you say "father," something serious immediately happens to you, and even to the person you are calling father, because he has to be a father. Perhaps that is why the Christians call their priests father; daddy would not fit, and Abba makes children laugh -- nobody would take him seriously.
The Hindus came from outside India. They are not original to this country. They are foreigners, without passports. And for centuries they went on coming from central Asia, from where all the European races have also come: the French, the English, the German, the Russian, the Scandinavian, the Lithuanian... and so on. All the
"ians" came from Mongolia, which today is almost a desert. Nobody bothers about Mongolia. Nobody even thinks it is a country. Part of it belongs to China, most of it belongs to Russia; and they are continuously fighting a cold war about where to draw the line, because Mongolia is just a desert.
But all these people, particularly the Aryans, came from Mongolia. They came to India because Mongolia had suddenly started turning into a desert, and they were growing in population, in the Indian way. They had to move in every direction. It was good. That's how all these countries came into existence.
But before the Aryans reached India it was already a very cultured country. It was not like Europe. When the Aryans reached Germany, or England, they had nobody to fight there. They found beautiful land without anybody to be afraid of. But in India the story was different. The people who lived in India before the Aryans entered must have been really civilized. I mean really, not just living in cities.
Two cities of those days have been excavated: Mohanjodro in Pakistan, which was once part of India; and
Harappa. These cities show strange things: they had wide streets, sixty feet wide; three storied buildings; bathrooms -- yes, attached to the bedroom. Even today millions in India are not aware that such a thing exists. In fact, if you told them they would laugh, they would think you were a little insane -- having a bathroom attached to your bedroom? Are you mad?
The latest designer would certainly look a little mad, even to you; because the latest design from Scandinavia is a bathroom with a bedroom included in it. The whole thing takes on a different meaning. It is basically a bathroom, and the bedroom is just in the corner, not even separated. The bathroom is more basic; it has a small swimming pool, and everything you need, and also a bed... but the bathroom is not attached to the bedroom, the bed is inside the bathroom.
Perhaps this may be the future shape of things, but if you tell it to the millions in India...! I was the only one in the whole village-my grandfather's village where I lived for so long -- who had a bathroom attached to his bedroom; and people made jokes about it. They used to ask me, "Do you really have a bathroom attached to your bedroom?" And they would say it in a whisper.
I would say, "There is no need to hide it -- yes, so what?"
They said, "We cannot believe it, because nobody in these parts has ever heard of a bathroom attached to a bedroom. This must be your grandmother. That woman is dangerous. She must have brought this idea. She does not belong to us, of course, she came from some faraway place. We have heard stories about her birthplace which we would not tell to a child. We should not tell them to you."
I said to them, "You need not worry. You can tell me, because she herself tells me."
They would say, "Look, we told you so! She is a strange woman from
Khajuraho. That place cannot produce right people."
Perhaps something of my Nani has created in me what they called "wrong," and I call "right."
The Hindus are not, as they claim, the oldest religion in the world. The Jainas are, but they are a very small minority, and very cowardly. But they brought the idea of twenty-four. Why twenty-four? I have wondered. I discussed it with
Masto, with my mother, and with my so-called mother-in-law, about whom I will talk sometime later. Nobody called her my mother-in-law in front of me, because both were dangerous. After my
Nani, she was certainly the most daring woman I have known. Of course I cannot give her the first place.
It was a joke that she was called my mother-in-law, but if you look at the words, mother-in-law... she was almost a mother to me, if not by nature, then by law. It was not that I was married to her daughter, although her daughter was in love with me. Of that in some other circle, because that is a very vicious circle, and I don't want to start it right now.
What is the time?
"Ten-thirty, Osho."
That's great, just ten minutes for me. It has been beautiful.
(OSHO BEGINS TO CHUCKLE. HE TRIED TO EXPLAIN WHAT HE WAS LAUGHING AT... BUT HE WAS LAUGHING TOO M
|
|